Criterion 2

CRITERION 2– TEACHING-LEARNING AND EVALUATION (200)

Key Indicator – 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile (10)

Metric No.DescriptionWeightage
2.1.1Demand Ratio (Average of last five years)5
2.1.2Average percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc.) as per applicable reservation policy during the last five years(Excluding Supernumerary Seats)5

Key Indicator -2.2 Catering to Student Diversity(20)

Metric No.DescriptionWeightage
2.2.1The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and  organises special Programmes for advanced learners and slow learners.10
2.2.2Student – Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)10

Key Indicator – 2.3 Teaching-Learning Process (20)

Metric No.DescriptionWeightage
2.3.1Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem-solving methodologies are used for enhancing their learning experiences6
2.3.2Teachers use ICT- enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching and learning processes6
2.3.3Ratio of students mentored for academic and other related issues   (Data to be provided only for the latest completed academic  year)8

Key Indicator – 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality (50)

Metric No.DescriptionWeightage
2.4.1Average percentage of full-time teachers appointed against the number of sanctioned posts during the last five years15
2.4.2Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph.D./D.M/M.Ch./D.N.B Superspeciality/D.Sc./D’Lit. during the last five years15
2.4.3Average teaching experience of full-time teachers in the same institution (Data to be provided only for the latest completed academic year, in number of years)10
2.4.4Average percentage of full-time teachers who received awards, recognition, fellowships at the State, National, International level from Government/Govt. recognised bodies during the last five years10

Key Indicator – 2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms (40)

Metric No.DescriptionWeightage
2.5.1Average number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end examination till the declaration of results during the last five years15
2.5.2Average percentage of student complaints/grievances about evaluation against total number appeared in the examinations during the last five years10
2.5.3IT integration and reforms in the examination procedures and processes (continuous internal assessment and end-semester assessment) have brought in considerable improvement in examination management system of the institution10
2.5.4Status of automation of Examination division along with approved Examination Manual5

Key Indicator – 2.6 Evaluation Process and Reforms (30)

Metric No.DescriptionWeightage
2.6.1The institution has stated learning outcomes (generic and programme specific)/graduate attributes which are integrated into the assessment process and widely publicized through the website and other documents10
2.6.2Attainment of Programme Outcomes, Programme Specific Outcomes and Course Outcomes are evaluated by the institution10
2.6.3Pass percentage of students (Data to be provided only for the latest completed academic year)10

Key Indicator – 2.7   Student Satisfaction Survey (30)

Metric No.DescriptionWeightage
2.7.1Online Student Satisfaction Survey regarding the teaching-learning process.( Online survey to be conducted)30